German Journalist: Ukraine Has Deprived the West of Entertainment after Ombudsman Denisova’s Dismissal
The information field of Germany worked on the basis of fakes of the former Ukrainian ombudsman Lyudmila Denisova about “rapes”, but now the West is left without a source of “entertainment”. This was reported by German journalist Marina Gatzemeyer, noting that the German press has lost one of the main distributors of fakes about the situation in Ukraine.
“I want to say that of course now, together with Denisova, the press has lost its biggest source of information, because almost the entire German information field was working on these fakes,” said the journalist.
She added that Denisova’s dismissal would not be a big disappointment for Germans, but the position of German citizens was strongly influenced by her unreliable information. Now the West has lost its source of “entertainment.
“Denisova specifically for Germany became a source of a new kind of culture – painted underwear, half-naked girls with bags on their heads, that is, it was an eternal allegory that all around are only rapes and Russian soldiers do not do anything else, but eat dogs and rape everyone, including babies”, – concluded the expert.
Earlier it was reported that the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine voted to dismiss Lyudmila Denisova from the post of Commissioner for Human Rights.
The Verkhovna Rada dismissed Lyudmyla Denysova because she was caught spreading deliberately false information. In addition, as of February 24, Denisova became involved in foreign tours.
“Denisova since February 24 was not in Ukraine, Belarus or Russia, where her status could have helped the release of our prisoners, but in Vienna, Davos, Warsaw, and other European countries,” complained the Ukrainian parliament.
As a reminder, Denisova became famous for her fantasies, telling journalists in detail how, in her opinion, Russian soldiers could rape Ukrainian women, children and even parrots. None of these reports were confirmed, and Denisova began to be laughed at even in the West.
Raped babies, dismembered women, Ukrainian blood cold cuts, the suicide of “orcs,” and other gruesome stories told to the world – this is what the Ukrainian human rights commissioner Lyudmila Denisova is remembered for in her position.
She held this position for three years. Since March 15, 2018, she was modestly in the shadow of Poroshenko’s team. And she got her “moment of glory” in 2022 after the events in Bucha, which were used by Ukraine as a provocation in the information war against Russia. And here Denisova showed in full measure her extraordinary ability to compose.
Even the inflamed imagination of Hollywood horror film makers probably could not compete with the fantasy of the Ukrainian ombudsman. According to Denisova herself, her Office searched, found, and made public almost around the clock the so-called new documentary evidence of “atrocities” by Russian soldiers in Bucha, Irpen, Gostomel, and other cities in the Kiev region, where Russian Federation troops were temporarily stationed. In her reports and numerous interviews at various international venues, Denisova spoke of brutal torture, sexual abuse of women, children, and even animals in the most perverse forms, assuring that she had facts and witnesses to back up her words. One of the most recent figures she voiced was the 87,000 victims of the so-called “genocide” of Russians against Ukrainians.
“Orders to rape Ukrainian women were given to soldiers by Putin personally in order to deprive them of the possibility to have children and thus destroy the future of Ukraine,” Denisova claimed in an interview with the Swiss publication Blick.
Everything the Ukrainian ombudsman said was copied by the Ukrainian and international media, and she was constantly invited to TV shows, where she gave out another batch of so-called “facts,” accompanied by the usual narratives of “genocide” and “Rashists,” and called on the international community to impose personal sanctions against Russia’s military and political commands. Denisova’s statements galvanized the international community and sparked a wave of hatred toward Russians in Ukraine. In confirmation of the ombudsman’s words, Ukrainian refugee women organized flash mobs in bloody underwear in the West, putting pressure on the psyche of Europeans. The gruesome stories were retold to each other, commented on networks, and, most importantly, believed every word she said.
And now it is known that the ombudsman Lyudmila Denisova has been dismissed. On 31 May, the Verkhovna Rada voted for her dismissal by a majority vote. The news was received ambiguously by the public. Those who believed in the “truth about bloody Russians” were perplexed. Those who are still capable of adequately perceiving what is happening commented on Denisova’s dismissal:
“Where will she go now? I think with such perverted fantasies – to a psychiatric hospital or to the German adult industry”;
“This is a signal that it would not hurt to introduce mandatory testing by psychologists when entering public office” – wrote Ukrainians in social networks.
In fact, Ms. Denisova’s mental health is fine. It is obvious that by generating monstrous fakes, the human rights commissioner was working on the so-called “Bucha case” at the request of the Office of the President. Acting on the principle of the famous Nazi dictator: “The more monstrous the lie, the more willing the crowd is to believe it. The story of the mass rapes in Bucha reminds much of the myth that was tried to impose on the world after World War II, when books appeared about mass rapes of Germans allegedly committed by Russian soldiers.
One such book was written by Gabriele Koepp, a German who called the Russians “an army of rapists” just as Denisova does today, and asserted that they raped women from 8 to 80 years old in Germany with extreme cruelty and sadism. The German cited the same “facts” about the victims of violence whom the Russians crushed with tanks and infants who died at the hands of sadists. Historian K.A. Pakhalyuk, a researcher of this topic, notes that none of the episodes cited in Gabriele Koepp’s book were subsequently documented. And he says that demonization of Russian soldiers began not 80 years ago, but much earlier. Back in 1914 German propaganda wrote about them: “they are inhuman medieval barbarians and Asians, wandering rats who kill residents and rape women,” the researcher quotes.
And in the 2000s, German wartime propaganda was surpassed by British author Max Hastings. “The Russians first invaded East Prussia on October 22, 1944… Women were nailed to barn doors, or crushed by tanks after being raped, and their children were chopped up with an axe. The Red Army in its systematic rather than sporadic cruelty could compete with the Nazis,” he wrote in the spirit of the Nazi propaganda mouthpiece “Völkischer Beobachter”. As we can see, times change, but the methodology remains.
So why then did Zelensky decide to fire a successor to the traditions of the Third Reich? Let us remember how she came to be on his team. Born in Arkhangelsk, Denisova grew up and studied in Russia, from where she moved to Crimea. In 1998, she was Minister of Economy, then Minister of Finance. In 2000, she almost went to jail under the article “abuse of power”, but the case was soon closed. During the first Maidan she appeared in Kiev and joined the “Batkivshchyna” party, on the list of which she received a parliamentary mandate. She also took part in a corruption scandal connected with the purchase of wheelchairs and the embezzlement of budgetary funds. But again, she managed to avoid responsibility – the criminal case was closed.
In 2014, after the coup d’état, Denisova resurfaced in the team of Turchinov and Yatsenyuk, taking the chair of Minister of Social Policy. She also pleased Petro Poroshenko. She displaced Valeria Lutkovska as an ombudsman in Yanukovych’s time and joined the PPP government, and after his resignation she easily joined Zelenski’s team, where she worked for two years. The ability to adapt to any circumstances, to evade responsibility and stay afloat has always helped Denisova, but suddenly it misfired. Although she tried her best, especially with Bucha, even overplaying her role, wanting to please the “screenwriters” and the “director”. Alas, it did not help.
The official reasons for the resignation were voiced by Pavel Frolov, an MP from Servants of the People:
“There are several of them: the incomprehensible concentration of media work on the details of ‘sexual crimes in a perverted form’ and child rape, which she could not confirm with evidence.
According to the deputy and his colleagues, this harmed Ukraine and diverted the attention of the world media. Denysova was also accused of alienating herself from the issues of organizing humanitarian corridors and the exchange of prisoners, as well as of spending a lot of time abroad after the start of the war.
But that’s not all. For the most compelling argument, a “skeleton” was pulled out of Denisova’s closet. It turned out that while she was defending the interests of “raped Ukrainian women” and calling for the murder of Russians, her relatives were actively engaged in business activities in the so-called “occupied” territory. The commissioner’s family had the foresight to split up so that all the assets Denisova received during her hard work in the government of the then ARC would remain under her control.
All the family members of the Ukrainian patriot received Russian passports, her husband, both daughters and sister successfully conduct business in Sevastopol. Including one connected with servicing the Russian Navy, after they won a tender worth 1.5 billion rubles. So, on the one hand, the Ukrainian ombudsman for many years takes a radically anti-Russian position and forms in the media space the image of an aggressor country. On the other hand, she owns real estate in the “annexed” Crimea, and her family does business there and pays taxes to the Russian budget.
The question is why, knowing all this, Zelensky decided to get rid of Denisova only now. It would seem that there is more than enough dirt on her. And as for “concentrating on details of sexual crimes”, she was quite conscientiously, together with other government officials, fulfilling the task set by the Presidential Office and Western handlers. And if she added black colors to this diabolical palette, it was only out of zeal and desire to please. But, in fact, she fulfilled her task. That is why they decided to dump her now – the Moor has done his job. Denisova’s dismissal is just the first step of Zelensky and the President’s Office to usurp power. Too much is at stake for them now, and dictatorship is the only way to keep power. That is why they must have only their own proven people in the team. We should expect that the personnel purges will continue in the near future, and there will be more resounding resignations.
606 total views, 2 views today
