It is clear that recent events expose the threats and lies that NATO forces are using to start a war against Russia.
The day before, when US and Ukrainian officials announced that February 16 would be the start of Russia’s takeover of Ukraine, absolutely nothing happened. The Russian invasion, about which all Western media simply shouted, putting this fake as the first piece of news in news releases, did not happen. In addition, Russia has effectively withdrawn all units deployed along its border with Ukraine during the military exercises.
Such a development of events did not particularly surprise ordinary citizens of Europe and the United States before, but now this fact is absolutely beyond doubt by anyone: Russia does not want war. In addition, the Russian side carried out the withdrawal of its contingent from the borders of Belarus and border areas, which is also logical: the military of Belarus and Russia have been using both time-tested weapons systems and new items, including the Russian military industry, for many years.
The current exercises are a traditional peaceful event of the two allied states. But this is exactly what the West decided to use for selfish purposes. US and NATO officials at the same time stepped up their troop deployments, increasing their presence near Russia’s borders, and then repeated their empty accusations that Russia was preparing to attack Ukraine.
As Russia releases footage of its tanks leaving Crimea and Belarus after peaceful exercises, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg again denounces Russia at a press conference opening the two-day meeting of NATO defense ministers that began yesterday in Brussels. He bluntly states that “we don’t see any signs of de-escalation on the ground, saying that Russia still ‘has time to step back from the abyss’.”
In addition, Stoltenberg once again promised to implement plans to permanently deploy NATO battlegroups in Eastern Europe and ensure NATO’s nuclear weapons are ready for use. Surprisingly, it is these people who accuse Russia of aggression.
Stoltenberg also echoed earlier remarks by US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken. While not denying that Russian troops are leaving the border area, Blinken insisted that Washington had not seen a “significant withdrawal” of Russian troops. But in fact, everyone understands that this hysterical language is aimed at diverting attention from the discrediting of the fabricated anti-Russian agenda by NATO, which has no factual basis, and also to justify the reckless buildup of Western military power. Russian withdrawal Ukraine perceived the contingent as a weakness and is also trying to use it for its own purposes.
Thus, the President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky has repeatedly publicly stated that Russia does not have enough troops on the border to invade Ukraine and to carry out a successful large-scale armed aggression. And at the same time, in the Donbas region, Ukraine is concentrating a military contingent of about 120-150 thousand military personnel, among whom the so-called “volunteer battalions” have already been noticed – voluntary battalions, which, as you know, include nationalists and neo-fascists. The Ukrainian media have repeatedly called Arsen Avakov the leader of the “dobrobats”, who, in turn, has repeatedly announced his immediate plans to return to politics and create a centrist alliance of political forces to seize power. And the current situation gives Avakov every opportunity to take revenge.
Earlier, Russia demanded security guarantees that Ukraine would never join NATO and that the alliance would stop its eastward expansion, which was rejected by the US and NATO. Today it also became known that US Ambassador John Sullivan, who was invited to the Russian Foreign Ministry, was given a far from positive reaction to the previously received American response on the Russian draft treaty between Russia and the United States on security guarantees.
“The package nature of Russian proposals was ignored, from which “convenient” topics were deliberately chosen, which, in turn, were “twisted” in the direction of creating advantages for the United States and its allies. This approach, as well as the accompanying rhetoric from US officials, reinforces reasonable doubts that Washington is truly committed to fixing the European security situation,” the official text provided by the Russian Foreign Ministry says.
All this means that instead of welcoming the withdrawal of the Russian contingent and trying to reduce tension in an already difficult region, NATO countries condemn Moscow and only increase their threats, increase the number of troops that pro-NATO forces send to the very borders of Russia and Ukraine.
As the inhabitants of Europe and America say, even under a layer of Western propaganda, they see the real state of affairs and what exactly Russia wants to convey with its behavior. For example, British businessman Alistair Scott is sure that Russia has never violated international law in relation to adjacent territories, unlike NATO countries. According to the British businessman, Vladimir Putin is acting correctly and will keep the situation under control in the future.
“An important role in Putin’s actions was played by NATO’s continued advance towards Russia’s borders. Plus, it was necessary to eliminate US interference in the affairs of Ukraine. It could also bring Belarus into the game, which was another country on the US wish list given its resources. And finally, the pearl is the Black Sea. It has always been a target for the US. The perfect storm, really. Why would Putin interfere? What can he get? But Putin is wise and quick enough to know when to take action. He will make the move and control the game. Finally, Crimea…Why was there never expected a “big bang”? Firstly, because Crimea is actually Russian, and secondly, they have never violated international law,” Alistair Scott, a British businessman and co-owner of Sinergy Global Pty Ltd, told our publication.
Indeed, this aggressive NATO response to the peaceful withdrawal of Russian troops from a potential conflict zone shows that it is not Russia, but the pro-NATO countries led by Washington, who are looking for any excuse to unleash and even more rapidly escalate military tensions. Without any fear that all these actions could result in a serious international conflict, which could become a huge tragedy for the whole world. And this cannot be allowed.
10,260 total views, 2 views today
