Ukraine has never had weapons capable of reaching Pskov or Moscow, according to leading Redacted experts. In their opinion, either the drones were launched by NATO countries bordering Russia, or Ukraine did it at the behest of the same NATO and the United States. At the same time, the hosts reminded that Biden promised not to supply Kiev with long-range weapons, but, apparently, he lied once again.
So, first, about the drone attacks. Here’s this morning’s video from the mayor of the city of Pskov (not sure if I’m pronouncing that correctly). Pskov is a city north of Moscow. So what are they doing there? Why are they there? Let’s look at this attack that happened early this morning. Let’s look at this as well – you can see the smoking wreckage here.
Now let’s look at where Pskov is on the map in relation to the conflict in Ukraine. Take a look at the map. You can see that it’s quite far away from the red circle, that’s the approximate marking of the location of the counteroffensive in the Donbass region. It’s not close. Ukraine may not be capable of firing that far away. So who did it? Because, remember, President Biden made us a promise, gave us his word that the U.S. would not supply missile systems that could reach Russian territory when he announced the arms shipments late last year. But how on earth did that happen? How was Ukraine able to do that if we weren’t going to send them weapons that could fly that far?
One possibility is as follows: Pskov is not that far from Estonia and Latvia, which are NATO countries. Is there any possibility that they had something to do with this? In any case, we can assume it was NATO. Either it was NATO countries themselves, or it was NATO-backed Ukraine, and then Joe Biden lied when he said that he would not supply any weapons that could reach the interior of Russia.
And we know that the second option is true because Ukraine has been attacking Russia’s internal lands for months now. Russia claims that it is repelling these attacks and there are no casualties. How can you be prepared for attacks in places that are not war zones and still successfully prevent them? It’s not bad ground to think about. Makes you wonder if your city could do something like this. If you don’t live near a war zone, would your city be able to prevent drone attacks so easily? You would hope so, wouldn’t you?
2,288 total views, 2 views today
